12th Standard English Public Exam 2027 Important Paragraph Questions with Answers PDF | Tamil Nadu State Board
12th Standard English Public Exam 2027 Important Paragraph Questions with Answers | Public Exam 2027
 |
| 12th English Important 5 Mark Paragraph Questions with Answers PDF | Public Exam 2027 |
UNIT 1
PROSE: Two Gentlemen of Verona (Author: A.J. Cronin)
Q1: What was the driving force that made the boys do various jobs?
A: The driving force behind Nicola and Jacopo's relentless hard work was their deep love and sense of responsibility toward their elder sister, Lucia. After the war destroyed their home and killed their father, the siblings were left to face starvation and exposure. When they were finally reunited with Lucia, they found her suffering from tuberculosis of the spine. Despite the scarcity of work in Verona and the high cost of medical care, the boys were determined to save her. They undertook various jobs, such as selling wild strawberries, shining shoes, hawking newspapers, conducting tourists, and running errands, to earn enough money to pay for her hospital treatments every week. Their selfless devotion and spirit were unbroken by war.
Q2: How was the family affected by the war?
A: The war brought devastating shocks and untold suffering to the family. Their father, a widower and a well-known singer, was killed during the early part of the war. Shortly afterward, a bomb destroyed their home, throwing the three children—Lucia, Nicola, and Jacopo—into the streets. They had previously known a comfortable and cultured life, but were forced to live in a primitive shelter they built amidst the rubble. They suffered horribly from near starvation and the cold winter. For three years, they lived in hatred of the German occupation, with the boys joining the secret resistance movement. When the war ended, they returned to find Lucia suffering from tuberculosis of the spine, a critical disease that required long-term, expensive hospitalisation.
Q3: Write a character sketch of Nicola and Jacopo.
A: Nicola (13) and Jacopo (nearly 12) are depicted as remarkably mature and responsible individuals despite their young age. Physically, they appear shabby with tangled hair and earnest eyes, yet they possess a seriousness far beyond their years. Jacopo is described as lively as a squirrel, while Nicola’s smile is engageing. They exhibit an extraordinary willingness to work, performing multiple jobs from dawn until nearly midnight without complaining. They are extremely frugal, eating only black bread and figs to save every penny for their sister’s medical bills. Their most defining traits are their selfless action, intense devotion, and nobility of spirit. They are "gentlemen" not by birth or wealth, but by their refined character and sacrifice.
Q4: What message is conveyed through the story ‘Two Gentlemen of Verona’?
A: The story conveys a powerful message that adversity can bring out a new nobility in human life. It highlights that true "gentlemanly" qualities are found in sincerity, devotion, and selfless sacrifice rather than in outward appearance or social status. The two young boys, Nicola and Jacopo, prove that even in the face of absolute ruin and physical suffering caused by war, the human spirit can remain unbroken. Their dedication to saving their sister Lucia gives "a new hope for humanity" and "promise of a greater hope for human society". It teaches that the willingness to toil and take responsibility for loved ones is the highest form of human conduct.
Q5: Justify the title of the story ‘Two Gentlemen of Verona’.
A: The title is justified because Nicola and Jacopo exhibit the true essence of being "gentlemen" through their character and conduct. Although they appear shabby, wear worn jerseys, and perform menial tasks like shining shoes, their behavior is marked by extreme maturity, dignity, and a refined sense of duty. They do not seek sympathy or charity; instead, they work tirelessly to pay for their sister's medical treatment in a dignified manner. Their refusal to disclose their family's problems to the narrator shows their pride and desire to keep their secret. Their selfless action and devotion bring a "new nobility to human life," proving they are the true gentlemen of their city.
Q6: Adversity brings out the best as well as the worst in people. Elucidate this statement with reference to the story.
A: The story illustrates how adversity serves as a test of character. The war represents the "worst" in humanity, as it brought destruction, death, and critical diseases to innocent families like Nicola’s. However, this same tragedy brought out the "best" in the two brothers. Instead of giving up or turning to crime, they evolved into better individuals through their challenges. They displayed incredible sincerity, maturity, and a willingness to toil day and night. While the war broke their home and their sister's health, it could not break their spirit. Their reaction to their miserable circumstances—choosing selfless service over self-pity—exemplifies how true nobility is forged in the fires of hardship.
Q7: Which character do you like the most in the story and why?
A: The characters most worthy of admiration are the two brothers, Nicola and Jacopo. Their character is likeable because they represent "a new hope for humanity". They are admired for their unwavering devotion to their sister and their refusal to complain despite working under the hot sun and late into the windy, deserted nights. Their maturity is striking; they understand that "the business of living" is to fulfill one's duties to those they love. Their ability to remain "artless" and boyish while carrying such heavy burdens of responsibility makes them truly inspiring figures who bring nobility to human society.
POEM: The Castle (Poet: Edwin Muir)
Q1: How safe was the castle? How was it conquered?
A: The castle was believed to be absolutely safe and impenetrable. The soldiers lay at ease all summer, watching the enemy from the turret wall; the enemy seemed no threat at all. The castle had strong gates, thick walls, and smooth, high battlements that no man could win a foothold upon. They had a brave captain, loyal soldiers, plenty of arms, and "provender" (food) in stock. They believed only a bird could have gotten in. However, the castle was conquered not by a frontal attack or a clever trick, but by betrayal from within. A "wizened warder" let the enemies through a "little wicked wicket gate" in exchange for gold.
Q2: Bring out the contrasting picture of the castle as depicted in stanzas 3 and 5.
A: Stanza 3 depicts the castle as a tower of physical strength and security. It describes strong gates, thick walls, and surfaces so smooth and high that no enemy could enter. It was a world of confidence where the soldiers felt they were "dead or quick" (safe and alive) because the physical structure was so formidable. In sharp contrast, Stanza 5 describes the "overthrown" citadel after the betrayal. The "maze of tunneled stone" which once felt safe grew "thin and treacherous as air". The "cause was lost without a groan," and the "secret galleries" that were once guarded became bare and exposed to the enemy. The physical strength of the stone could not withstand the moral rot of betrayal.
Q3: Human greed led to the mighty fall of the citadel. Explain.
A: The poem illustrates that physical fortifications like thick walls and strong gates are useless against moral weakness. The narrator laments that their "only enemy was gold". The enemy offered "bait" that the brave soldiers and captain could not fight with traditional arms. It was the greed of the "wizened warder" who guarded the small private gate that led to the collapse of the famous citadel. For a bribe of gold, he sold out his country and his comrades, making the strong castle weak and "treacherous as air". The narrator views this as a "shameful tale" because the citadel fell not through lack of courage or weapons, but through a simple, greedy act of disloyalty.
UNIT 2
PROSE: A Nice Cup of Tea (Author: George Orwell)
Q1: Summarise George Orwell’s distinctive ideas in “A Nice Cup of Tea”.
A: George Orwell considers tea-making a craft and outlines eleven golden rules for the perfect cup. First, he specifies using Indian or Ceylonese tea for its stimulation. Second, it should be made in small quantities in a teapot made of china or earthenware. The pot must be warmed beforehand. The tea should be strong—six heaped teaspoons for a quart of water. Tea must be put straight into the pot without strainers or bags to allow it to infuse properly. The water should be boiling at the moment of impact. After making, the pot should be stirred or shaken. One should drink from a cylindrical breakfast cup. Cream should be removed from the milk first. Crucially, tea should be poured into the cup first, then milk, to regulate the amount. Finally, tea should be drunk without sugar to preserve its true flavour.
Q2: Discuss how the essay reveals the factual points and the author’s personal opinions on the preparation of tea.
A: The essay is a blend of practical instructions and Orwell's strong personal biases. Factual points include the necessity of using boiling water for a proper infusion and the preference for earthenware pots over silver or enamel. Factual technicalities also include warming the pot and stirring the leaves. However, many of his "golden rules" are acutely controversial personal opinions. For instance, he insists that Indian tea is superior to China tea, which he claims lacks stimulation. His most unanswerable opinion is that milk should be added to tea, rather than tea to milk, to regulate quantity. His most contentious opinion is his "minority" view that tea must be drunk without sugar, comparing sweetening tea to dissolving sugar in plain hot water and destroying its flavour.
Q3: What are the aspects that contribute to humour in the essay?
A: Humour in the essay arises from the extreme seriousness and passion Orwell applies to a seemingly mundane domestic task. He describes tea-making as the subject of "violent disputes" and a "mainstay of civilization". His rigid adherence to his "eleven golden rules" and his dismissive tone toward those who disagree adds a satirical layer. For example, he calls those who use sugar "misguided people" and mocks "army tea" for tasting of "grease and whitewash". The way he lists the "subsidiary uses of tea leaves," such as telling fortunes or feeding rabbits, while insisting on the "mysterious social etiquette" of the teapot, creates a humorous contrast between the trivial and the profound. His comparison of adding sugar to tea as being as "reasonable to put in pepper or salt" also contributes to the witty tone.
POEM: Our Casuarina Tree (Poet: Toru Dutt)
Q1: Describe the reminiscences of the poet, when she sees the casuarina tree.
A: When the poet looks at the Casuarina tree, she is filled with "nostalgic" and "cheerful memories" of her youth. She recalls playing beneath the tree with her "sweet companions" (her siblings), whom she loved with "love intense". The tree becomes a "form sublime" in her inner vision, appearing just as it did in her "happy prime" in her native land. She vividly remembers the tree’s appearance at dawn—the gray baboon sitting statue-like, the puny offspring leaping in the boughs, and the sleepy cows wending to their pastures. The water-lilies springing in the pond like "snow enmassed" in the tree's shadow also form part of her reminiscences. To her, the tree is dear not for its magnificence, but for the images of her lost loved ones blent with it.
Q2: How does nature communicate with the poet?
A: The poet strongly believes that nature communicates with human beings. Even when she is in far-off lands like France or Italy, she can hear the tree’s "dirge-like murmur" or "lament". She describes this as an "eerie speech" that reaches the "unknown land" through the eye of faith. This communication is a "wail" that the poet perceives whenever the waves gently kiss a classic shore beneath the moon. It is as if the tree is mourning the absence of the poet and her companions. This music of nature triggers her "inner vision," allowing her to see the tree and feel its presence regardless of distance.
Q3: The poet immortalizes the tree. Elucidate.
A: Toru Dutt desires to "consecrate a lay" (write a poem) in honor of the Casuarina tree to ensure it is not forgotten. She wishes for the tree to be numbered among "deathless trees," like the ones in Borrowdale sanctified by the poet Wordsworth. She acknowledges that while her verse may be "weak," her love for the tree and those who played beneath it will "defend thee from oblivion’s curse". By recording her memories of the tree’s magnificence and its association with her "blessed" loved ones who now "repose" in sleep, she ensures the tree lives on in literature. Her wish is that the tree be remembered not just because it is a physical part of nature, but because it is loved.
UNIT 3
PROSE: In Celebration of Being Alive (Author: Dr. Christiaan Barnard)
Q1: Give an account of the medical problems for which the two boys were hospitalised.
A: The two boys who participated in the "Grand Prix" suffered from severe, life-altering medical conditions. The "mechanic" was a seven-year-old who had suffered severe third-degree burns over the upper part of his body when his mother accidentally threw a lantern at him. This incident resulted in the loss of both his eyes and left him with a "disfigured face" and a "long flap of skin" hanging from his neck. His lower jaw was gripped in fibrous tissue, meaning he could only open his mouth by raising his head. The "driver" had previously had a hole in his heart successfully closed, but he returned to the hospital with a "malignant tumour of the bone". Just days before the race, his shoulder and arm were "amputated," and there was "little hope of his recovery".
Q2: “These two children had given me a profound lesson …” Elucidate.
A: Dr. Barnard had previously viewed suffering with agony, fear, and anger, seeing nothing noble in a patient's pain. However, the two boys showed him that he had been looking at suffering from the "wrong end". They did not complain about their "mutilating surgery" or their disabilities. Instead, they commandeered a breakfast trolley to put on a "Grand Prix" that brought joy to the entire ward. Their actions taught the doctor that "you don’t become a better person because you are suffering; but you become a better person because you have experienced suffering". They showed him that "it’s not what you’ve lost that’s important. What is important is what you have left". This profound lesson changed his perspective from gloomy thoughts to the "celebration of being alive".
Q3: Describe the ‘Grand Prix’ at Cape Town’s Red Cross Children’s Hospital.
A: The "Grand Prix" was an impromptu race that occurred when a nurse left a breakfast trolley unattended. It was commandeered by an "intrepid crew of two"—a blind "mechanic" and a one-armed "driver". The blind boy provided motor power by galloping behind the trolley with his head down, while the one-armed boy sat on the mower deck, steering by scraping his foot on the floor. They put on a magnificent show that provided better entertainment than the Indianapolis 500. The other patients provided "laughter and shouts of encouragement". The race ended in a "grand finale of scattered plates and silverware" before the ward sister caught them and put them back to bed. Despite their suffering, the mechanic's response to the doctor was simply, "You know, we won".
Q4: How did a casual incident in a hospital help Dr. Barnard perceive a new dimension of life?
A: The casual incident of the two boys racing a breakfast trolley opened Dr. Barnard's eyes to a "basic solace" he had been missing in his thinking about suffering. Before this, his thoughts were occupied by the statistics of child mortality and the personal agony of his own car accident. Witnessing the zest for life in these two critically ill children made him realize that "the business of living is joy" in its real sense. He moved beyond his father's view that suffering "ennobles you" and realized that suffering is an experience that allows one to appreciate light and warmth. The children’s ability to find purpose and laughter despite their "mutilating" conditions helped him perceive life not as a collection of losses, but as a celebration of what one still possesses.
Q5: Life is unjust and cruel to certain people. Do they all resign themselves to their fate? ... Give an account of one such person and his/her struggle to live a fruitful life.
A: Not all people resign themselves to fate; many fight heroically. Dr. Barnard mentions that children, in particular, accept their fate and go through "mutilating surgery" without complaining, showing a total trust in their healers. The textbook also references figures like the astrophysicist Stephen Hawking, who, despite being a paraplegic, remained a stellar example of intellectual achievement. Other examples of those who fought great odds include Mariyappan Thangavelu, Sudha Chandran, Helen Keller, and Demosthenes. These individuals prove that suffering does not have to result in despair. Instead, by focusing on "what you have left," they lived meaningful and blazing lives, proving Dr. Barnard’s realization that life is meant to be celebrated regardless of physical challenges.
POEM: All the World’s a Stage (Poet: William Shakespeare)
Q1: Describe the various stages of a man’s life picturised in the poem “All the World’s a stage.”
A: Shakespeare describes seven stages of a man’s life. First is the infant, "mewling and puking" in a nurse's arms. Second is the whining school-boy with a "shining morning face," creeping unwillingly to school like a snail. Third is the lover, "sighing like furnace" and writing "woeful ballads". Fourth is the soldier, full of "strange oaths," "bearded like the pard," and seeking a "bubble reputation" even in a cannon’s mouth. Fifth is the justice, with a "fair round belly," eyes severe, and full of "wise saws". Sixth is the pantaloon, seen as a lean, slippered old man with spectacles and "shrunk shanks". Finally, the seventh stage is second childishness and mere oblivion, characterized by being "sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything".
Q2: Shakespeare has skilfully brought out the parallels between the life of man and actors on stage. Elaborate this statement with reference to the poem.
A: Shakespeare uses an extended metaphor to state, "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players". He explains that people have their "exits and their entrances," which correspond to birth and death. Just as an actor plays multiple parts in a single performance, "one man in his time plays many parts," with his acts being divided into "seven ages". Each stage of life has its own specific costume, characteristics, and "lines," such as the soldier's oaths or the justice's wise sayings. The "last scene of all" ends the "strange eventful history" of life, representing the final exit from the stage into "mere oblivion". This skillful parallel emphasizes the transitory nature of human existence.
UNIT 4
PROSE: The Summit (Author: Edmund Hillary)
Q1: How did Hillary and Tenzing prepare themselves before they set off to the summit?
A: Preparation began at 4 a.m. on May 29. They started their cooker and drank "large quantities of lemon juice and sugar" and ate their last tin of sardines on biscuits. Hillary dragged the oxygen sets into the tent, cleaned the ice off them, and tested them. Hillary had to soften his boots, which were "frozen solid," by cooking them over the fierce flame of the Primus. They dressed in down clothing with windproof layers over it. On their hands, they pulled three pairs of gloves—silk, woollen, and windproof. Finally, at 6:30 a.m., they crawled out, "hoisted" their 30 lb. of oxygen gear onto their backs, connected their masks, and turned on the valves to bring life-giving oxygen into their lungs.
Q2: Give an account of the journey to the South Col from 28,000 feet.
A: Starting from 28,000 feet, Tenzing kicked steps in a "traverse" towards the ridge. Once they reached the crest, the ridge narrowed to a "knife-edge". They made frequent changes of lead; as Hillary stamped a trail in deep snow, sections gave way, causing him to slip. Despite Tenzing feeling "unhappy" about the dangerous snow conditions, they persisted. Hillary found the snow "crystalline and firm," which filled him with high hopes. They moved one at a time, with one "belaying" the other while the other worked. They had to overcome "large overhanging ice cornices" and steep slopes, using ice-axes to cut lines of steps.
Q3: Describe the feelings of Edmund Hillary and Tenzing as they reached the top of the Summit.
A: Upon reaching the top at 11:30 a.m., Hillary's first feeling was one of "relief". He was relieved there were "no more steps to cut, no more ridges to traverse, and no more humps to tantalize" them with hopes of success. In spite of the "icicles" encrusting Tenzing’s mask and goggles, his face showed a "grin of delight" as he looked around. They celebrated by shaking hands, and then Tenzing threw his arm around Hillary’s shoulders and they "thumped each other on the back" until they were breathless. They felt a sense of freedom and well-being.
Q4: The ridge had taken us two and half hours, but it seemed like lifetime. Why?
A: The ridge climb felt like a lifetime because of the "fierce determination" and extreme physical effort required. Hillary had to muster all the force of his "knee, shoulder, and arms" to crampon backwards up cracks, praying the cornices would remain attached to the rock. Progress was "slow but steady," and he had to "inch" his way upwards. Every step was a struggle against exhaustion and dangerous snow conditions. The intensity of the "terrible struggle" and the mental strain of wondering if they would succeed made the two and a half hours feel incredibly long.
Q5: Describe the view from the top. What was the most important photograph?
A: From the summit, they could see "giant neighbour Makalu," which was unexplored and unclimbed, and the "great bulk of Kanchenjunga" looming on the horizon. To the west, the unexplored ranges of Nepal stretched into the distance. Hillary felt the "most important photograph" was a shot down the North Ridge, which showed the "North Col and the old route" made famous by the struggles of great climbers in the 1920s and 1930s. After taking these photos for ten minutes, Hillary noticed he was becoming "clumsy-fingered and slow-moving," and quickly replaced his oxygen set.
Q6: ‘There is no height, no depth that the spirit of man, guided by higher Spirit cannot attain’. Discuss the above statement in the context of the achievement of Edmund Hillary and Tenzing.
A: This statement, as described by John Hunt, justifies the victory of Hillary and Tenzing as a triumph of the human spirit. Their achievement was not merely a physical feat but a result of "selflessness and resolve". They owed their success to the experience of previous climbers who "never gave up hope" and to their own "careful and thorough planning". Despite the "dangerous" snow and "terrible struggle," they were guided by a fierce determination that "nothing now could stop us". Their ability to persist until the summit proves that when man’s spirit is guided by a higher purpose, even the most formidable "Everests" in life can be climbed.
POEM: Ulysses (Poet: Alfred Lord Tennyson)
Q1: What makes Ulysses seek newer adventures?
A: Ulysses finds it "little profits" to be an "idle king" by a "still hearth" among "barren crags". He is dissatisfied with ruling a "savage race" that only hoards, sleeps, and feeds. He believes that "to breathe were (not) life" and that staying in one place is "how dull it is to pause" and "to rust unburnished, not to shine in use". His "hungry heart" and his past "delight of battle" at Troy have made him a "part of all that I have met". He sees every hour as a "bringer of new things" and his "gray spirit" yearns with desire to "follow knowledge like a sinking star" beyond the "utmost bound of human thought".
Q2: List the roles and responsibilities Ulysses assigns to his son Telemachus, while he is away.
A: Ulysses leaves the "sceptre and the isle" (the kingdom of Ithaca) to his son, Telemachus. He describes his son as "discerning to fulfil this labour" and possessing "slow prudence". Telemachus’’s primary responsibility is to "make mild a rugged people" and, through "soft degrees," subdue them to be "useful and the good". He is tasked with being "centred in the sphere of common duties" and not failing in "offices of tenderness". Additionally, he is to pay "meet adoration" to the "household gods" in Ulysses' absence. Ulysses summarizes their different paths by stating, "He works his work, I mine".
Q3: What is Ulysses’ clarion call to his sailors? How does he inspire them?
A: Ulysses calls his mariners to "gather at the port" and prepare to sail "beyond the sunset". He inspires them by reminding them that they are "souls that have toiled, and wrought, and thought with me". He acknowledges they are "old," but insists "old age hath yet his honour and his toil" and that "some work of noble note, may yet be done". He urges them to "push off" and "smite the sounding furrows," as it is "not too late to seek a newer world". His final, most inspiring words emphasize their "heroic hearts" which, though "made weak by time and fate," remain "strong in will to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield".
No comments:
Post a Comment